Artificial Intelligence and Human Resource Management: A Counterfactual Analysis of Productivity

Authors

  • Geoffrey Ditta

Abstract

This study explores how industrial firms could have achieved stronger competitive performance if artificial intelligence–driven human resource management (AI-HRM) practices had existed during earlier stages of industrial production. The central objective is to estimate the potential impact of AI on organizational efficiency and workforce performance by constructing a counterfactual scenario grounded in empirical data. Using an industrial firm dataset, the research develops a counterfactual analytical model that links key HR indicators training intensity, absenteeism, labor productivity, turnover rates, and workforce allocation to a set of organizational performance outcomes such as profitability, operational efficiency, defect reduction, and total output. The model employs regression-based simulations and predictive estimation techniques to project how AI-supported HR processes in recruitment, workforce planning, scheduling, evaluation, and competency management might have altered these historical outcomes. Specific attention is given to how AI could enhance precision in staffing decisions, improve skill-task matching, reduce information asymmetries in performance evaluation, and optimize the coordination between human and technological resources. Findings suggest that firms characterized by high labor intensity, rigid hierarchical structures, and limited coordination mechanisms would have experienced the strongest efficiency and productivity gains under an AI-HRM scenario. The simulations show notable reductions in absenteeism, better alignment between training and production needs, and measurable increases in output per worker. Overall, the study highlights the strategic value of integrating AI into HRM by demonstrating that, even in past industrial contexts, AI could have operated as a cognitive and organizational stabilizer, reducing inefficiencies and reinforcing the firm’s capacity to adapt, coordinate, and perform.

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Human Resource Management, Industrial Performance, Organizational Efficiency, Counterfactual Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. 1. Adams-Prassl, J. (2019). What if your boss was an algorithm? Economic incentives, legal challenges, and the rise of artificial intelligence at work. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol’y J, 41, 123.

  2. 2. Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2022). Prediction machines, updated and expanded: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Press.

  3. 3. Ahmed, N., & Wahed, M. (2020). The De-democratization of AI: Deep learning and the compute divide in artificial intelligence research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.15581.

  4. 4. Al Naqbi, H., Bahroun, Z., & Ahmed, V. (2024). Enhancing work productivity through generative artificial intelligence: A comprehensive literature review, Sustainability, 16(3), 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031166

  5. 5. Bickley, S. J., Macintyre, A., & Torgler, B. (2025). Artificial intelligence and big data in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Surveys, 39(1), 103-

  6. 145. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12611

  7. 6. Bishop, J. M. (2021). Artificial intelligence is stupid and causal reasoning will not fix it, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 513-474. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2020.513474

  8. 7. Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics (No. w24001), National Bureau of Economic Research.

  9. 8. Bujold, A., Roberge-Maltais, I., Parent-Rocheleau, X., Boasen, J., Sénécal, S., & Léger, P. M. (2024). Responsible artificial intelligence in human resources management: a review of the empirical literature, AI and Ethics, 4(4), 1185-1200.

  10. 9. Chander, B., John, C., Warrier, L., & Gopalakrishnan, K. (2025). Toward trustworthy artificial intelligence (TAI) in the context of explainability and robustness, ACM Computing Surveys, 57(6), 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3675392

  11. 10. Degas, A., Islam, M. R., Hurter, C., Barua, S., Rahman, H., Poudel, M.,... & Arico, P. (2022). A survey on artificial intelligence (ai) and explainable ai in air traffic management: Current trends and development with future research trajectory, Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ app12031295

  12. 11. Fernández-Loría, C., Provost, F., & Han, X. (2022). Explaining data-driven decisions made by AI systems: The counterfactual approach, MIS Quarterly, 46(3), 1635-

  13. 1660. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2022/16749

  14. 12. Floridi, L. (2023). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities.

  15. 13. Hamon, R., Junklewitz, H., & Sanchez, I. (2020). Robustness and explainability of artificial intelligence, Publications Office of the European Union, 207(40).

  16. 14. Hayajneh, J. A. M., Elayan, M. B. H., Abdellatif, M. A. M., & Abubakar, A. M. (2022). Impact of business analytics and π-shaped skills on innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA, Technology in Society, 68,

  17. 101914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101914

  18. 15. Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., Goel, D., Huang, K.,... & Hussain, A. (2024). Interpreting black-box models: a review on explainable artificial intelligence, Cognitive Computation, 16(1), 45-74.

  19. 16. Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2022). A framework for collaborative artificial intelligence in marketing, Journal of Retailing, 98(2), 209-223. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.03.001

  20. 17. Li, P., Bastone, A., Mohamad, T. A., & Schiavone, F. (2023). How does artificial intelligence impact human resources performance. evidence from a healthcare institution in the United Arab Emirates, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), 100-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100340

  21. 18. Maghsudi, S., Lan, A., Xu, J., & van Der Schaar, M. (2021). Personalized education in the artificial intelligence era: what to expect next, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38(3), 37-50. 10.1109/MSP.2021.3055032

  22. 19. Mithas, S., Chen, Z. L., Saldanha, T. J., & De Oliveira Silveira, A. (2022). How will artificial intelligence and Industry 4.0 emerging technologies transform operations management?, Production and Operations Management, 31(12), 4475-4487. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13864

  23. 20. Moosavi, S., Farajzadeh-Zanjani, M., Razavi-Far, R., Palade, V., & Saif, M. (2024). Explainable AI in manufacturing and industrial cyber–physical systems: A survey, Electronics, 13(17), 3497. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13173497

  24. 21. Murugesan, U., Subramanian, P., Srivastava, S., & Dwivedi, A. (2023). A study of artificial intelligence impacts on human resource digitalization in industry 4.0, Decision Analytics Journal, 7, 100-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. dajour.2023.100249

  25. 22. Presbitero, A., & Teng-Calleja, M. (2023). Job attitudes and career behaviors relating to employees’ perceived incorporation of artificial intelligence in the workplace: a career self-management perspective, Personnel Review, 52(4), 1169-1187. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2021-0103

  26. 23. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of management review, 46(1), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072

  27. 24. Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B.,... & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to- end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 33-44).

  28. 25. Revathy, S., Sreekala, S. P., Praveenadevi, D., Rajeshwari, S., De Albuquerque, V. H. C., Raj, P., & Yadav, S. P. (2023). The intelligent implications of artificial intelligence-driven decision-making in business management. Toward Artificial General Intelligence: Deep Learning, Neural Networks, Generative AI, 251.

  29. 26. Rakholia, R., Suárez-Cetrulo, A. L., Singh, M., & Carbajo, R. S. (2024). Advancing Manufacturing Through Artificial Intelligence: Current Landscape, Perspectives, Best Practices, Challenges and Future Direction. IEEE Access.

  30. 27. Senoner, J., Schallmoser, S., Kratzwald, B., Feuerriegel, S., & Netland, T. (2024). Explainable AI improves task performance in human–AI collaboration, Scientific reports, 14(1), 31150.

  31. 28. Sturm, T., & Peters, F. (2020). The impact of artificial intelligence on individual performance: Exploring the fit between task, data, and technology.

  32. 29. Tong, S., Jia, N., Luo, X., & Fang, Z. (2021). The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(9), 1600-1631. https://doi. org/10.1002/smj.3322

  33. 30. Ucar, A., Karakose, M., & Kırımça, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance applications: key components, trustworthiness, and future trends, Applied Sciences, 14(2), 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020898

  34. 31. Venugopal, M., Madhavan, V., Prasad, R., & Raman, R. (2024). Transformative AI in human resource management: enhancing workforce planning with topic modeling, Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2432550. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/23311975.2024.2432550

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Ditta, G. (2026) “Artificial Intelligence and Human Resource Management: A Counterfactual Analysis of Productivity”, AIS Journal. Vlora, Albania, 17(33), pp. 11–28. Available at: https://www.albanica.al/academicus/article/view/8686 (Accessed: 25 May 2026).

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 33 (2026): Academicus

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Academicus

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

All articles content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons License of
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).