Servant Leadership and Compassionate School Cultures in South African Catholic Schools

Authors

  • Melese Shula

Abstract

This study explored how servant leadership can foster compassionate school cultures in Catholic education, aiming to support the holistic development of learners, as viewed through the eyes of South African school principals. The research was driven by a desire to understand how ethical, relational, and faith-based leadership practices influence students’ emotional, social, moral, and academic wellbeing, especially in Catholic schools that weave spiritual and moral guidance into their educational framework. A qualitative phenomenological approach was used to gather insights from the principals’ lived experiences, employing semi-structured interviews and document analysis as the main methods for data collection. Twelve principals, purposively selected to represent urban, peri-urban, and rural Catholic schools, took part in the study. The data were analysed thematically to uncover patterns and insights related to servant leadership practices, the challenges faced, and their effects on school culture. The study identified four main themes: the essential role of empathetic presence in fostering compassion, the importance of relational care through meaningful interactions with both staff and students, the integration of faith-based moral and spiritual development in line with Catholic Social Teaching, and the challenges to maintaining compassionate practices, such as limited resources and teacher burnout. Principals noted that servant leadership creates inclusive and supportive school environments, which in turn promotes the overall development of learners by addressing their emotional, social, and ethical needs alongside their academic progress. The research concludes that when servant leadership is implemented through empathy, relational care, and faith-based principles, it can significantly transform Catholic education. It highlights the need for intentional leadership, systemic support, and the incorporation of culturally and spiritually relevant frameworks, like Ubuntu and Catholic Social Teaching, to nurture compassionate school cultures. These findings have important implications for developing leadership, shaping policies, and advancing holistic, learner-centred education in faith-based school contexts.

Keywords:

servant leadership, compassionate school culture, Catholic education, Ubuntu, Holistic learner development

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. 1. Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2019). Daily strengths use and employee well-being: The moderating role of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92 (1), 144–168. https://doi. org/10.1111/joop.12243

  2. 2. Begley, P. T., & Stefkovich, J. A. (2007). Ethical leadership in schools: Creating community in an era of accountability (3rd ed.). Routledge.

  3. 3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

  4. 4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

  5. 5. Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

  6. 6. Chikoko, V., & Tikly, L. (2021). Educational leadership, inequality, and social justice in South Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211067387

  7. 7. Cipriano, C., & Brackett, M. A. (2021). Educators’ emotional well-being and learning environments: A case for social–emotional leadership. School Psychology Review, 50(2–3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1864265

  8. 8. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2020). What is SEL? https://casel.org

  9. 9. Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social– emotional learning: Predictors of teacher stress, job satisfaction, and sense of efficacy. Educational Psychology, 40(3), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144 3410.2019.1689430

  10. 10. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

  11. 11. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

  12. 12. Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004

  13. 13. Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. Jossey-Bass.

  14. 14. Grace, G. (2016). Faith, mission and challenge in Catholic education: The selected works (1st ed.). Routledge.

  15. 15. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.

  16. 16. Hoadley, U., & Christie, P. (2022). Education and inequality in South Africa. Oxford University Press.

  17. 17. Joseph, E. E., & Winston, B. E. (2005). A correlation of servant leadership, leader trust, and organizational trust. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2019-0207

  18. 18. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi- structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72 (12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

  19. 19. Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing. American Psychologist, 62 (2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95

  20. 20. King, S., & Baxter, R. (2022). Servant leadership and school belonging: Exploring relational leadership in secondary schools. Educational Leadership Quarterly, 39(4), 586–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211067311

  21. 21. Kotzé, T., & van Deventer, I. (2021). Leadership practices and learner wellbeing in South African schools. South African Journal of Education, 41 (2), Article a1834. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n2a1834

  22. 22. Letseka, M. (2000). African philosophy and educational discourse. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(11), 1161–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013185 7.2019.1654379

  23. 23. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101–115. https:// DOI:10.1016/j. leaqua.2008.01.006

  24. 24. Makirimani, R. K., & Naicker, S. R. (2025). Servant leadership attributes for raising teacher morale in primary schools. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 15(1), Article a1596. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v15i1.1596

  25. 25. Mason, M. (2018). Sample size and saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Research, 19(3), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.2927

  26. 26. Mbigi, L. (2007). Ubuntu: The African dream in management (2nd ed.). Knowledge Resources.

  27. 27. McGrath, J., & Noble, K. (2022). Balancing accountability and relational leadership in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 23 (1), 55–78. https:// www.eejournals.org/

  28. 28. Miller, J. P. (2007). The holistic curriculum (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.

  29. 29. Mooketsi, B. E., & Phaswana, E. D. (2022). Ubuntu and leadership in South African schools. Africa Education Review, 19(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1 080/18146627.2021.1977530

  30. 30. Naidoo, T., & Beswick, K. (2023). Teacher stress, school leadership, and learner wellbeing in South African schools. South African Journal of Education, 43 (2), Article a1904. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n2a1904

  31. 31. Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

  32. 32. Ohiwerei, F. O., & Efosa, O. (2023). Ethical leadership and student wellbeing in faith-based schools. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 7(1), 45–60.

  33. 33. O’Keefe, J. M., & Kopko, E. (2022). Catholic education and the common good: The role of Catholic social teaching in schooling. International Studies in Catholic Education, 14 (2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/19422539.2022.2043549

  34. 34. Jonker, C.S., & Dube, S.C. (2025). Servant leadership and well-being: A scoping review of positive organisational outcomes. SA Journal of Human Resource Management/SA Tydskrif vir Menslikehulpbronbestuur, 23(0), a2783. https:// doi. org/10.4102/sajhrm. v23i0.2783

  35. 35. Nussbaum, B. (2003). Ubuntu: Reflections of a South African on our common humanity. Reflections, 4(4), 21–26.

  36. 36. Ohiwerei, F. O., & Efosa, E. O. (2023). Faith-based leadership and student wellbeing. Journal of Religious Education, 71 (1), 45–59. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40839-022-00169-5

  37. 37. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. Jossey-Bass.

  38. 38. Shula, M. 2023. “Principals’ Servant Leadership Practices and Teacher Motivation: Perspectives from South African Rural Schools’ Context.” Perspectives in Education 41 (4): 162–176.

  39. 39. Shula, M. 2025. “Servant leadership in action: fostering school culture and community engagement in South African Catholic schools” International Studies in Catholic Education, DOI: 10.1080/19422539.2025.2589439

  40. 40. Spears, L. C. (2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. The Journal of Virtues & Leadership, 1(1), 25–30.

  41. 41. Sullivan, M., & Murphy, E. (2022). Faith-based leadership and moral education in schools. Journal of School Leadership, 32 (4), 409–430. https://doi. org/10.1177/10526846211000045

  42. 42. Swart, C., Pottas, L., Maree, D. J. F., & Graham, M. A. (2022). Roll up your sleeves: Servant leadership as a paradigm for the challenging South African school context. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221119018

  43. 43. Swart, C. B. (2024). ADVANCING THE DISCOURSE ON SERVANT LEADERSHIP IN SCHOOLS: AN EXPLORATION OF INTERPRETATIONS. In INTED2024 Proceedings (pp. 1102-1111). IATED.

  44. 44. van Dierendonck, D., & Patterson, K. (2009). Servant leadership: Research trends, theory building, and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101440

  45. 45. Ward, C. L., van der Merwe, A., & Dawes, A. (2012). Youth violence, trauma, and resilience in South Africa. Child Abuse & Neglect, 123, 105384. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105384

  46. 46. Ware, H., Reid, K., & Leung, F. (2022). Compassionate schools and emotional engagement: Implications for leadership. School Psychology International, 43(5), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343221104811

  47. 47. Waters, L. (2020). Using positive psychology interventions to strengthen family happiness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(5), 645–658. https://doi.org /10.1080/17439760.2020.1789704

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Shula, M. (2026) “Servant Leadership and Compassionate School Cultures in South African Catholic Schools”, AIS Journal. Vlora, Albania, 17(33), pp. 165–186. Available at: https://www.albanica.al/academicus/article/view/8694 (Accessed: 25 May 2026).

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 33 (2026): Academicus

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Academicus

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

All articles content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons License of
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).