Gender Dynamics in Mnemonic instruction: Enhancing Reading Skills Among Grade Three Learners with Dyslexia through Mnemonic Instruction in Mpumalanga Public Schools, South Africa

Authors

  • Lilian Zindoga

Abstract

Two theories were applied: the information processing and Skinner’s reinforcement theory. A method for estimating causal links without random assignment was employed. There were two institutions: an experimental one and a normal one. Using judicious sampling methods, 43 participants from the two chosen schools were included in the study. The questionnaires were completed by 23 parents from the intervention school. Information was gathered using the Bangor Dyslexia Test (BDT), pre- and post-tests, and a literacy assessment exam. There was a statistically significant difference between the reading scores of boys and girls with dyslexia, according to the results of the independent samples t-test. When examining reading skill alone as a component of reading ability, female students’ results (M=26.7; SD=7.7) were significantly higher than those of male students (M=13.0; SD=6.7), t (21) = 4.563, p =.000 <.001. This suggests that gender plays a significant role in improving reading ability through mnemonic intervention, with female students outperforming male students. According to the study, the Department of Education (DBE) should create early assessments for male learners with dyslexia in their early school years.

Keywords:

Primary Schools, Learners, Dyslexia, Reading Ability, and Mnemonic Instruction (MI)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. 1. Asiko, C. (2013). Dyslexia Awareness Conference; Strive International: Addressing the challenges of dyslexia. https://mg.co.za/article/2013-09-20-00-addressing- the-challenges-of-dyslexia/

  2. 2. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D. & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661 DOI:10.1177/1744987120927206.

  3. 3. Critchfield, T.S., & Miller, J.R. (2017). Editorial: Are theories of reinforcement necessary? Behavior Analyst, 40, 11-16 httpd://doi.org/10.1007/s4061-017-0113-x

  4. 4. Dakhiel, M.A. & Al Rub, M.O.A. (2017). The Effectiveness of Pictured Letter Mnemonics Strategy in Learning Similar English Language Letters among Students with Learning Disabilities. World Journal of Education, 7 (6), 21-32

  5. 5. de Vocht, F., Katikireddi, S. V., McQuire, C., Tilling, K., Hickman, M., & Craig, P. (2021). Conceptualizing natural and quasi experiments in public health. Bio Med Central medical research methodology, 21, 1-8.

  6. 6. Fuentes, A., & Desrocher, M. (2013). The effects of gender on the retrieval of episodic and semantic components of autobiographical memory. Memory, 21(6), 619-632. 162 a cademicus internationa L scientific Journa L academicus.edu.aL 162

  7. 7. Funmilayo, E.O. (2022). The upshot of mnemonics on gender and other learning outcomes of senior secondary school students in biology. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 10(3):16-25.

  8. 8. Geertsema, S., Le Roux, M., van Niekerk, C., Dyer, L., Booyse, M., Bothma, M., & Nel, T. (2022). Developmental dyslexia in selected South African schools: Parent perspectives on management. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v12i1.1136

  9. 9. Goh, C.C.M., & Foong, K.P. (1997). Chinese ESL students’ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 1-15.

  10. 10. Han, W. (2025, January). Dyscalculia and dyslexia in school-aged children: comorbidity, support, and future prospects. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 10, p. 1515216). Frontiers Media SA.

  11. 11. Handley, M.A., Lyles, C.R., McCulloch, C., & Cattamanchi, A. (2018). Selecting and improving quasi-experimental designs in effectiveness and implementation research. Annual Review Public Health 39: 5-25. Doi: 10.1146/annurev- publhealth-040617-014128 Epub 2018 Jan 12. PMID:29328873; PMCID: PMC8011057

  12. 12. Hussein, H. (2025). Enhancing Literacy Skills: The Role of Adaptive and Assistive Technologies for Children with Dyslexia. Eminent Journal of Social Sciences, 1(4), 12-20.

  13. 13. International Dyslexia Association (IDA) (2021). Dyslexia Basics. Dyslexia Basics Fact Sheet 6-6-17. http://www.interdys.org

  14. 14. Iwahori, M., Oshiyama, C., & Matsuzaki, H. (2022). A quasi-experimental controlled study of a school-based mental health program to improve the self- esteem of primary school children. Humanities Social Sciences Community, 9, 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01156-x

  15. 15. Kurniati, D., Dwi, R., Saleh, M., & DwiAnggani, L.B. (2020). The effectiveness of picture mnemonics for teaching basic English communication for students with an intellectual disability. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ assehr.k.200620.058

  16. 16. Leseyane, M, Mandende, P., Makgato, M., & Madoda, C. (2018). Dyslexic learners’ experiences with their peers and teachers in special and mainstream primary schools in North -West Province. African Journal of Disability,7,1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod. v7i0.363

  17. 17. Lim, G. (2024). The implementation of the national reading program and reading levels of primary grade learners: Foundation for an enhanced reading program. International Journal of Education Humanities and Social Science, 7(06), 576-605.

  18. 18. Lubin, J., & Polloway, E.A. (2016). Mnemonic instruction in science and social studies for students with learning problems: A review. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 14 (2), 207-224.

  19. 19. Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2),81-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158

  20. 20. Musa, A.K., Dauda, B., & Umar, M.A. (2016). Gender differences in achievement goals and performances in English language and Mathematics of senior secondary school students in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(27), 165-175.

  21. 21. Okenyi, E.C., & Ezema, V.S. (2022). Effects of mnemonics and prior knowledge instructional strategies on pupils’ academic achievement in English language in Enugu State, Nigeria. Sapientia Foundation Journal of Education, Sciences & Gender Studies 4(1), 11-21.

  22. 22. Oso, W. Y., & Onen, D. (2009). A general guide to writing research proposal and report: A handbook of beginning researchers (Revised Edition). Jomo Kenyatta Foundations: Nairobi, Kenya.

  23. 23. Osuh, J.I., & Mwankon, S.B. (2022). The effect of different mnemonic strategies and gender on ability to recall among secondary school students in Jos, Plateau State. Gender, and Behaviour 20(4), 20741-20753. https://hdl.handle. net/10520/ejc-genbeh_v20_n4_a31

  24. 24. Overskeid, G. (2018). Do we need the environment to explain operant behaviour? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 302037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.00373.

  25. 25. Radovic, T., & Manzey, D. (2019). The impact of a mnemonic acronym on learning and performing a procedural task and its resilience toward interruptions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2019.02522.

  26. 26. Rafi, A., Ansar, A. & Sami, M.A. (2020). The implication of positive reinforcement strategy in dealing with disruptive behaviour in the classroom: a scoping review. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College 24 (2):173-179. DOI: https://doi. org/10.37939/jrmc. v24i2.1190

  27. 27. Sabaricos, E. M., Dinero, T. M. R. G., & Babar, L. J. D. (2021). Assessment of General Education Teacher’s Knowledge to Identify Pupils with Special Needs: Basis for Advocacy Program. 164 a cademicus internationa L scientific Journa L academicus.edu.aL 164

  28. 28. Sau, N. (2024). Development of Children with Dyslexia Aged 6 (Doctoral dissertation, City College).

  29. 29. Schunk, D. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (6 th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc/Allyn & Bacon.

  30. 30. Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behaviour. New York: Free Press.

  31. 31. Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behaviour. Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi. org/10.1037/11256-000

  32. 32. Snowling, M.J., Hulme, C., & Nation, K. (2020). Defining and understanding dyslexia: past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education, 46(4), 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756

  33. 33. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th edition). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon

  34. 34. Tabatabaei, S. O., & Hejazi, P. M. (2011, March). Oral Performance: Effect of Comprehensible Input and Output. In 2nd International Conference on Foreign Language Learning and Teaching (p. 144).

  35. 35. Wu, Y., Cheng, Y., Yang, X., Yu, W., & Wan, Y. (2022). Dyslexia: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 915053. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpubh.2022.91505

  36. 36. Zega, Y., Waruwu, Y., Laoli, A. & Zebua, E.P. (2024). Gender Representation in English Learning Materials Textbook at the Eight Grade of SMP Negeri 3 Sitolu Ori in 2024/2025. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 10(3), 980–989. https://doi. org/10.22225/jr.10.3.2024.980-989

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Zindoga, L. (2026) “Gender Dynamics in Mnemonic instruction: Enhancing Reading Skills Among Grade Three Learners with Dyslexia through Mnemonic Instruction in Mpumalanga Public Schools, South Africa”, AIS Journal. Vlora, Albania, 17(33), pp. 148–164. Available at: https://www.albanica.al/academicus/article/view/8693 (Accessed: 25 May 2026).