Peek: Prosthetic implant rehabilitation with materials alternative to titanium: A case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55312/op.vi2.4354Abstract
For several decades, titanium and its alloys has been the preferred and elective material for the manufacturing of the implants. However in recent years, because of some potential disadvantages of titanium, many researches have been done for fi nding a material which is even more powerful. PEEK is a semicrystalline thermoplastic with excellent mechanical and chemical resistance properties that are retained to high temperatures. The chemical structure of these polyaromatic ketones confers a stability at elevated temperatures(above 300 °C), resistance to chemical and radiation damage, high compatibility with many reinforcing agentssuch as glass fi bers and carbon, and higher resistance compared to many other metals. Already in the late 90s, this material was considered as the leading replacement metal, especially in orthopedics. This case report describes the placement of an implant in the position of the tooth number 26 in the maxillary area which is atrophic as a result of the pneumatization of the left maxillary sinus, that has signifi cantly reduced the amount and the height of the residual bone.Keywords:
Thermoplastic polymers, biomaterial, high compatibility, replacement metal, atrophic bone.Downloads
References
-
Maria, K., et al. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Dental Implants: A Case for Immediate Loading. International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research, 05-08/2011.
-
Kurtz S., Devine J. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants: A review. Biomaterials 2007; 28:4845-69.
-
Briem, D. Response of primary fi broblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces, J. Mat. Science: Mat. In Med 16: 671-677, 2005 JulP.I. Brånemark, R. Adell, T. Albrektsson, U. Lekholm, S. Lundkvist, B. Rockler, Osseointegrated titanium fi xtures in the treatment of edentulousness, Biomaterials, Volume 4, Issue 1, January 1983, Pages 25–28R. Adell, U. Lekholm, B. Rockler, P-I. Brånemark, J. Lindhe, B. Eriksson, L. Sbordone.
-
Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fi xtures: (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study 1.
-
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Volume 15, Issue 1, February 1986, Pages 39–52.
References
Maria, K., et al. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Dental Implants: A Case for Immediate Loading. International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research, 05-08/2011.
Kurtz S., Devine J. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants: A review. Biomaterials 2007; 28:4845-69.
Briem, D. Response of primary fi broblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces, J. Mat. Science: Mat. In Med 16: 671-677, 2005 JulP.I. Brånemark, R. Adell, T. Albrektsson, U. Lekholm, S. Lundkvist, B. Rockler, Osseointegrated titanium fi xtures in the treatment of edentulousness, Biomaterials, Volume 4, Issue 1, January 1983, Pages 25–28R. Adell, U. Lekholm, B. Rockler, P-I. Brånemark, J. Lindhe, B. Eriksson, L. Sbordone.
Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fi xtures: (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study 1.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Volume 15, Issue 1, February 1986, Pages 39–52.



